Al Masri Al Youm, p.10, (11-4-2009)

Gandhi and the Palestinian question: review of an old document

By: Dr. Refaat Sayed Ahmed

While some Arab rulers offer peace initiatives surrendering to the racial Zionist movement at the expense of the Arab and Palestinian rights, the history reminds us of visions and documents by non-Arab leaders and intellectuals who respected these Arab rights more than the Arabs themselves. One of these historical documents is an article written by the great Indian leader Gandhi. In this long Article, Gandhi expressed his opinion in the Zionist occupation of Palestine rejecting it as awfully wrongful, since this occupation displaces a people from their land replacing them with another people, i.e., the Zionist gangs. We recall this vision today as the Arabs are dejected and international powers are conspiring against the just rights of the Palestinian people. Worse still is that some Arab leaders tend to normalize relations with Israel and glorify Camp David agreement despite its serious impact on our national security. This document, I think, is important, immortal and praiseworthy.

In his wonderful article, Gandhi predicted the consequences of oppression. He said such oppression would generate an endless conflict between the authentic "Arab rights" and the continuous criminal "Jewish oppression". Gandhi is considered the spiritual father of India's independence from the British occupation through peaceful non-violent resistance, which he called "Satyagraha". In this historical article, Gandhi depicted his just vision on the Palestinian rights, a vision which rejects occupation as being equal to oppression. We will summarize Gandhi's article in a number of points. Gandhi's article "Non-Violent Vision on Conflict and Violence", was published in Harijan, a weekly newspaper he used to issue in three languages: English, Hindi and Gujarati. Following are the prominent points in the article:

Several letters have been received by me asking me to declare my views about the Arab-Jew question in Palestine and the persecution of the Jews in Germany. It is not without hesitation that I venture to offer my views on this very difficult question.

My sympathies are all with the Jews. I have known them intimately in South Africa. Some of them became life-long companions. Through these friends I came to learn much of their age-long persecution. They have been the untouchables of Christianity. The parallel between their treatment by Christians and the treatment of untouchables by Hindus is very close. Religious sanction has been invoked in both cases for the justification of the inhuman treatment meted out to them.

Apart from the friendships, therefore, there is the more common universal reason for my sympathy for the Jews.

But my sympathy does not blind me to the requirements of justice. The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine. Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where they are born and where they earn their livelihood?

Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home.

The noble course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French in precisely the same sense that Christians born in France are French. If the Jews have no home but Palestine, will they relish the idea of being forced to leave the other parts of the world in which they are settled? Or do they want a double home where they can remain at will? This cry for the national home affords a colourable justification for the German expulsion of the Jews.

But the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no parallel in history. The tyrants of old never went as mad as Hitler seems to have gone. And he is doing it with religious zeal. For he is propounding a new religion of exclusive and militant nationalism.

But if there can be no war against Germany, even for such a crime as is being committed against the Jews, surely there can be no alliance with Germany. How can there be alliance between a nation which claims to stand for justice and democracy and one which is the declared enemy of both? Or is England drifting towards armed dictatorship?

Can the Jews resist this shameful persecution? Is there a way to preserve their self-respect, and not to feel helpless, neglected and forlorn?

It is hardly necessary for me to point out that it is easier for the Jews than for the Czechs to follow my prescription. And they have in the Indian Satyagraha campaign in South Africa an exact parallel. There the Indians occupied precisely the same place that the Jews occupy in Germany. The persecution had also a religious tinge. Hence, they can lead peaceful non-violent resistance. ("This was not the case. Instead they turned to Palestine imposing such oppression on its people as they claim has been imposed on them by Hitler", the writer's comment).

But the Jews of Germany can offer Satyagraha under infinitely better auspices than the Indians of South Africa. And they have organized world opinion behind them. ("Once again, this was not the case. They have robbed the world, particularly Germany which paid them about $100 billion over a period of less than 60 years in compensation for the Holocaust illusions", the writer's comment).

And now a word to the Jews in Palestine. I have no doubt that they are going about it the wrong way. The Palestine of the Biblical conception is not a geographical tract. It is in their hearts. But if they must look to the Palestine of geography as their national home, it is wrong to enter it under the shadow of the British gun. There are hundreds of ways of reasoning with the Arabs, if they will only discard the help of the British bayonet. As it is, they are co-sharers with the British in despoiling a people who have done no wrong to them.

I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen the way of non-violence in resisting what they rightly regarded as an unwarrantable encroachment upon their country. But according to the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds (of the British and the Jews).

Let the Jews who claim to be the chosen race prove their title by choosing the way of non-violence for vindicating their position on earth. Every country is their home including Palestine not by aggression but by loving service. A Jewish friend has sent me a book called The Jewish Contribution to Civilization by Cecil Roth. It gives a record of what the Jews have done to enrich the world’s literature, art, music, drama, science, medicine, agriculture, etc. Given the will, the Jew can refuse to be treated as the outcaste of the West, to be despised or patronized. He can command the attention and respect of the world by being man, the chosen creation of God, instead of being man who is fast sinking to the brute and forsaken by God. (End of Gandhi's article)

Gandhi's warning has not been responded to till this day. Zionism has become a brutal movement, one that is surely forsaken by God, just as Gandhi predicted. God rejects such a movement and orders people to resist and fight it as it has committed terrorist acts against innocent people. Gandhi's article, I think, is very significant in this critical point of time for the Palestinian question. Gandhi's vision emphasizes the injustice done to the Palestinians and their right to protect the land, interests and sanctuaries.

Through his article, Gandhi condemns not only the Zionist project, but also those Arab leaders and intellectuals who surrendered to it and urged their peoples to accept the crime so-called "Israel". Gandhi is worthy of tribute for his fair vision and vigilant conscience.